School of Jesus Disciples REV 2:7
2010.07.24 07:39
School of Jesus Disciples REV 2:7
743 S. Grandview St. L.A. CA. 90057 Tel. (213)928-2932 Pastor P.K.
Every Sunday 3:30 pm JD-class Email: peterkim123@sbcglobal.net Seeking to make disciples who make disciples.
“그러나 너는 모든 일에 근신하여 고난을 받으며 전도인의 일을 하며 네 직무를 다하라” But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry. II Tim 4:5
Devotional to JDs,
Obama Healthcare HR3200 for VeriChip & Watch !!! “Death Panels” Watch!!!
The Path to preset for AntiChrist 666 for Total horror control
[계 20:4-계 20:5]
(4)또 내가 보좌들을 보니 거기 앉은 자들이 있어 심판하는 권세를 받았더라 또 내가 보니 예수의 증거와 하나님의 말씀을 인하여 목 베임을 받은 자의 영혼들과 또 짐승과 그의 우상에게 경배하지도 아니하고 이마와 손에 그의 표를 받지도 아니한 자들이 살아서 그리스도로 더불어 천년 동안 왕 노릇하니 (5)(그 나머지 죽은 자들은 그 천년이 차기까지 살지 못하더라) 이는 첫째 부활이라
(4)And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. (5) But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. Rev 20:4-5
To the Palin/HR 3200 provision on end-of-life counseling they talk about panel discussions on the definition of death. I have this vision of a room with a couple of tables, behind which sit men with mean faces and military uniforms. These are not Americans, by the way, so this death panel is somewhere else. There are armed guards at the doors, and the doors open, with more guards escorting in a small group of people at gunpoint.
One of the officers at the table shuffles some papers and reads off a charge of the people having violated some oppressive rule of the regime, perhaps having published critical articles about men with mean faces and military uniforms. Then the officer tells the people they are all sentenced to death, and the people start crying and cursing as their guards drag them away.
I'll admit I haven't read the entirety of HR 3200, but I haven't seen anything remotely like that scenario. I can believe such death panels happened in Nazi Germany or some oppressed Latin American country. I think it is a tremendous exaggeration to call the end-of-life counseling with a doctor a death panel. Sensitive people might feel pressured to forgo care or, if a patient is in a coma, perhaps the individual named to consider such matters in the patient's Living Will could be pressured to forgo further attempts to extend grandma's life.
Abuses of any power can be hypothesized to occur. However....the bill does put substantial authority into the government's hands instead of the insurance company's hands. So it is prudent, I think, to verify what powers the government is going to give itself.
DANGER! From my reading, the bigger danger as far as a death panel comes from the powers of the Health Choices Commissioner (Sec. 203(a)) and the Health Benefits Advisory Committee (Sec. 123(a)&(b)): DANGER!
HR3200 -Sec. 203(a):
"The Commissioner shall specify the benefits to be made available under Exchange-participating health benefits plans during each plan year..."
Sec. 123(a)): "There is established a private-public advisory committee which shall be a panel of medical and other experts to be known as the Health Benefits Advisory Committee to recommend covered benefits and essential, enhanced, and premium plans."
Sec 123(b) (1) "The Health Benefits Advisory Committee shall recommend to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this subtitle referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) benefit standards (as defined in paragraph (4)), and periodic updates to such standards. In developing such recommendations, the Committee shall take into account innovation in health care and consider how such standards could reduce health disparities."
Covered benefits (Sec 123(b)(4), "including categories of covered treatments, items and services within benefit classes, and cost-sharing"), meaning things like knee replacements and cancer treatments, will be determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Health Choices Commissioner (to be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate), and the Health Benefits Advisory Committee (to be appointed by the President [up to 17 people] and the Comptroller General [9 people], without confirmation).
There is obvious opportunity here for the Secretary, Commissioner, and Committee to recommend that some condition not be covered, such as dementia or other category-likely conditions. No one is going to pull the plug on grandma, but they could decide they just aren't going to pay for having her plugged in, at all. But let's assume that the conditions are officially covered. We aren't out of the woods yet.
Title IV, Section 2404, covers the implementation of best practices. It involves changing the Public Health Care Act, by inserting some new sections, including Part D, Section 931(h), which says that in general, "The Director shall enter into voluntary arrangements with health care providers (including hospitals and other health facilities and health practitioners) in a State or region to implement best practices identified or developed under this section." (by the Secretary).
The Director is defined in the Public Health Care Act, which I haven't looked up, but I believe the intent is that doctors will be informed of best practices but not required to use them, not even by having payment depend on having used them.
Voluntary guidelines can be ignored. If the doctors don’t agree with the treatments recommended, they will generally be inclined to ignore them.
Thus, no cost savings. Perhaps the government plans to incentivize the doctors by paying them more if they use the recommended treatments? That doesn’t sound like it would promote cost savings, even if doctors are all as greedy as the President has implied, so that they use whatever treatment enriches them the most genenally.
So if you have invested money in figuring out how to save money and then the recommendations are ignored, you have lost money. When this happens, what stops the government from taking steps to make the guidelines into requirements? To control costs, of course. To keep the health care financial burden from destroying the economy.
Once the guidelines are requirements, the door is open to the government making recommended treatment guidelines based on political considerations to reduce the number of people in a category that is, shall we say, inconvenient to have around. That would fit the definition of a death panel. It’s more impersonal and more efficient than what the phrase conjures up as a vision, but people would die as a result of the council’s decisions. People would die to save money.
The point is that the worst thing about the bill is that it gives government the power and authority to do terrible things. The bill contains fragile protections that could be overruled later with much less fanfare than the current bill has, when people have relaxed, thinking the fight is over. The only real safety is in keeping government out of the insurance business altogether.
No Commissioner, Committee, Exchange, best practices recommendations...just you, your doctor, and your insurance company. This doesn't mean there is no useful reform to be had. Coverage of pre-existing conditions and ensured portability are good reforms. Letting people buy insurance across state lines, while I don't think it will help much, is a reasonable choice. Rolling Medicare and Medicaid together and loosening the restrictions so anyone can sign up, and pay income-dependent premiums (so everyone has "skin in the game"), would amount to a public option but that's what Medicare and Medicaid already are.
If my insurance company denies me coverage for some treatment, and I survive, I might be able to find a different insurance company without having to leave the country. Where and how am I going to find another government? I could sue an insurance company, but am I going to be able to sue the government? – Ritmore.
Death Panel이라는 단어가 미국 정치권의 키워드로 부상했다. 버락 오바마 대통령이 타운홀미팅을 통해 의료보험 개혁에 드라이브를 걸자, 공화당과 의료업계 로비스트들은 Death Panel을 만들려는 의도가 감춰져 있다며 반발했다. 이 단어가 튀어나오자 미국 전체가 양분돼 찬반 소용돌이에 빠져들었다. 죽음을 앞둔 노인들에게 바로 어필했다. Death Panel은 환자의 생사를 가르는 안락사를 결정하는 위원회를 뜻한다.
하지만 국내언론들은 Death Panel을 엉뚱하게 번역했다. 정부 공무원들로 구성된 '죽음의 위원회’라는 것이다. '죽음의 위원회'라고 번역하면 미국 노인들이 반발하는 기저에 깔린 뜻을 전달하기에는 부족하다. Death Panel을 다룬 언론보도를 살펴보자.
<연합뉴스 8월 16일 2010년 보도>
"공화당 부통령 후보였던 세라 페일린 전 알래스카 주지사가 의보개혁이 이뤄지면 비용 절감을 위해 `죽음의 위원회'(death panel), 즉 공무원 조직을 통해 환자의 운명이 결정될 것이라고 말하는 등 의보개혁 `공포심'을 조장하는 것을 겨냥한 것이다.
<연합뉴스 8월 16일 보도>
"의보개혁이 이뤄지면 정부가 노인 환자들의 치료 거부를 결정하는 '죽음의 위원
회'(death panel)를 세울 것이라는 공화당 측의 공포심 조장에 대해서도 자신 친할
머니의 죽음을 언급하며 강하게 반박했다." 연합뉴스의 보도를 보면 Death Panel이 공무원조직이고 비용을 절약하기 위해 노인환자 치료를 거부하는 결정권을 가지고 있다.
<동아일보 8월 15일자>
“지난해 대선 공화당 부통령 후보였던 세라 페일린 전 알래스카 주지사는 “민주당 개혁안이 통과되면 (국영 보험의 지출을 줄이기 위해) 차도가 없는 병든 노인들은 사실상 강제로 치료가 중단되고, 나의 막내아들(다운증후군을 갖고 태어난 아기)도 세상에 태어나지 못했을 것”이라는 자극적 주장을 하고 있다. 그러면서 민주당이 ‘죽음의 위원회(death panel)’를 만들려 한다고 낙인찍었다. ”
CBS
“오바마 개혁안이 통과되면 병의 경력을 이유로 보험 자격이 상실되고 '죽음 위원회' (death panel. 건강보험 통제권을 가진 정부관리)로부터 치료를 거부당하게 될 것이라고 주장하고 있다.”
다음은 위키피디아에 실린 것으로 H.R.3200에 대한 설명이다. 이는 2009년 7월 14일 민주당이 하원에 발의한 의료보험개혁 법안이다. 이 법안 중에서 환자가 사망선택유언을 할 경우 카운셀링한 것에 대한 비용환급 문제를 다룬 Reimbursement for counseling about living wills을 보면 Death Panel과 관련된 설명이 나온다.
The Advance Care Planning Consultation proposal in the legislation has been criticized by some Republicans and conservatives, such as Betsy McCaughey, a lobbyist for the healthcare industry who also helped to defeat the Clinton health care plan of 1993, who allege that it includes mandatory language aimed at pressing elderly patients toward euthanasia.
[7] That provision was also the basis for a charge by Sarah Palin that "my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their 'level of productivity in society,'whether they are worthy of health care."
[8] In fact, the cited provision of the bill merely authorizes Medicare reimbursement for physicians who provide voluntary counseling about such subjects as living wills. [7] [8] The provision is based on a separate bill that was cosponsored by a Republican, Charles Boustany of Louisiana. [9] His Democratic cosponsor, Earl Blumenauer of Oregon, has called this attack on the bill "an all-time low".
[9] The "death panel" argument was endorsed by the Investor's Business Daily, which analogized the bill to the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom and editorialized: "People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn't have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless." [10] Hawking, who has lived his entire life in the United Kingdom,[11] responded, "I wouldn’t be here today if it were not for the NHS. I have received a large amount of high-quality treatment without which I would not have survived."[12]
위 내용은 Death Panel을 둘러싼 논란을 설명한 것으로, Advance Care Planning Consultation(ACPC)을 법안에 넣은게 공화당과 로비스트 베스티 맥코이 등 보수주의자들의 공격 타깃이 되고 있다는 것이다. 법안의 세부내용을 살펴보면 ACPC는 환자와 의사 간에 이뤄진 상담으로 사망선택유언 등 향후 치료전반에 대한 내용을 포괄적으로 설명하고 있다.
직역하면 '향후관리계획자문'인데 안락사 등 앞으로 어떻게 하는게 좋을지 환자에게 상담해주는 것을 말한다. 맥코이는 이를 두고 노인환자들에게 안락사를 강요하는 강제적인 조항이라고 공격했다. 2008년 대선때 공화당 부통령 후보였던 새라 페일린은 맥코이의 주장을 따라이 조항을 집중적으로 공격했다.
"나의 부모 또는 다운 증후군을 앓고 있는 나의 아들이 오바마의 Death Panel 앞에서 서야할 것이다." 요컨대 오바마의 의료개혁법이 실행되면 관료들이 사망여부를 결정하는 Death Panel을 구성하게 되고, 생산성이 떨어지는 사람들은 이 위원회에서 생사가 갈린다는 논리이다. 실제로 법안의 이 부분은 사망 선택유언 (Living Will)과 관련해 카운셀링을 한 의사에게도 진료비를 의료보험에서 지급토록 할 수 있도록 하는 내용이다.
Death Panel은 안락사 또는 존엄사를 결정하는 위원회에 가깝다. "사망선고 위원회"라고 말하는게 가장 근접한 번역이 될 듯하다. 생명위원회 또는 국가생명 윤리위원회라고 병기하면 그 속에 감춰진 뜻을 전달할 수 있다. 이 위원회는 의료 비용를 줄이기 위한 관료조직을 말하는게 아니다. 공화당이 생명윤리 문제를 다루는 조직의 설립에 대한 위기감을 확산시키기 위해 Death Panel이라는 것이다.
On the Obama - Death Panel
Whether or not this is actually Obama, this poster alone is cause for impeachment. The ObamaCare Death Panel (OC DP) or Obama's Death Panel, is a group of who are the deciders for who gets sacrificed on the altar of socialized medicine. Their secret plot was exposed by The Greatest Maveratrix Ever, who had no choice but to exploit to defend her handicapped son, Trig, for the sake of attention children everywhere.
Now, sure, the fact huggers out there will try to tell you that Obama's plan only includes voluntary "end of life" counseling, and that the "death panel" is a crass fiction made up by desperate Republican spin doctors. Don't listen! Real or not, doesn't "death panel" feel scary?
Who Can Become An Obama Death Panel Worker?
Ideal candidates for a "death panel" include abortion doctors who need a little work on the side when it is not "abortion season". Like fetuses, old people are easily dispatched with the combination of tongs and vacuums.
Your local Death Panel may also include one or more of the following:
A Horse Doctor
An animal shelter employee
A meat plant janitor
A Libertarian
What Do Obama Death Panel Workers Do?
Whatever Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck say they do. After all, they both have children; are you questioning the concerns of loving parents? How dare you!
Where Do Obama Death Panel Workers Work?
Construction is being completed on the FEMA camps where all the undesirables are sent for socialist re-education and homosexualization.
Myths About Obama's Death Panel
Obama's only trying to encourage old people to make out living wills
Even if this were true, Obama would still be committing heresy; after all, God is the only one who can decide when you die, and it is your duty as a good Christian to linger on for years in a state of living death until He calls you to His side. Amen.
Who Supports Death Panels
The Autism Society of America - these liberal monsters actually form autism fan clubs!
Who is Joining the Fight Against "Death Panels"
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.)
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
And Many Real Americans
Obama's Death Panel Defeated: We Won! Old People Won't Have to Die!
Thanks to the infinite wisdom of Sarah Palin, old people will have to pay costly bills before they die cursing their wretched suffering won't have to suffer at the hands of death anymore! Hurray!
Palin vs. Obama: Death Panels
On Aug. 12, 2009 Palin attempted to clear up her argument with a detailed Facebook post. Palin discussed Section 1233 and said that "it’s misleading for the President to describe this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients." Palin goes onto argue:
Palin, Aug. 12: The issue is the context in which that information is provided and the coercive effect these consultations will have in that context. … These consultations are authorized whenever a Medicare recipient’s health changes significantly or when they enter a nursing home, and they are part of a bill whose stated purpose is “to reduce the growth in health care spending.” Is it any wonder that senior citizens might view such consultations as attempts to convince them to help reduce health care costs by accepting minimal end-of-life care?
The fact remains that the bill wouldn’t require patients to receive counseling sessions, nor would it require a doctor to offer one. Rather, it modifies Section 1861(s)2 of the Social Security Act, defining what services Medicare will pay for. So if a patient receives a counseling session from a doctor or health care practitioner, he or she doesn’t have to pay for it – Medicare will. As we pointed out in our earlier story, Medicare will also pay for prosthetic limbs, but that doesn’t mean that every recipient gets those, too.
And the concern that these sessions are "part of a bill whose stated purpose is ‘to reduce the growth in health care spending,’ " while true, is hardly the whole story. One of the bill’s other goals is to "provide affordable, quality health care for all Americans." The legislation is 1,017 pages long with sections that cut costs, some that increase care, and some that do both. In fact, the counseling sessions would add to government expenses since Medicare would have to reimburse doctors.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates officially that Section 1233 will cost a net total of $2.7 billion over 10 years. Furthermore, proposals to offer reimbursement for such counseling have attracted bipartisan support. Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson of Georgia, a sponsor of one such measure, gave an interview to the Washington Post on August 10, in which he discussed the benefits of these counseling sessions "both for the sanity of the family and what savings the family has." Isakson also commented on the recent confusion around the issue:
Isakson, Aug. 10: I just had a phone call where someone said Sarah Palin’s web site had talked about the House bill having death panels on it where people would be euthanized. How someone could take an end of life directive or a living will as that is nuts. You’re putting the authority in the individual rather than the government. I don’t know how that got so mixed up.
Palin also attempts to buttress her case by quoting some writings by Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a health policy adviser to the president. Here she’s echoing claims made elsewhere, twisting the meaning of Emanuel’s writings and taking them out of context. We examined those claims in an Ask FactCheck item we posted earlier today, and won’t repeat the details here.
Mr. Grassley said in a statement that he and others in the small group of senators that was trying to negotiate a health care plan had dropped any “end of life” proposals from consideration. A pending House bill has language authorizing Medicare to finance beneficiaries’ consultations with professionals on whether to authorize aggressive and potentially life-saving interventions later in life. Though the consultations would be voluntary, and a similar provision passed in Congress last year without such a furor, Mr. Grassley said it was being dropped in the Senate “because of the way they could be misinterpreted and implemented incorrectly.”
In an editorial, the newspaper reminded its readers of the Aktion T4 program of Nazi Germany in which “children and adults with disabilities, and anyone anywhere in the Third Reich was subject to execution who was blind, deaf, senile, retarded, or had any significant neurological condition.”
When the Democrats included money for family planning in a proposed version of the stimulus bill in January, the socially conservative George Neumayr wrote for the American Spectator: “Euthanasia is another shovel ready job for Pelosi to assign to the states. Reducing health care costs under Obama’s plan, after all, counts as economic stimulus, too — controlling life, controlling death, controlling costs.”
The legislation did not direct the coordinator to dictate doctors’ treatments. A separate part of the law — regarding a council set up to coordinate research comparing the effectiveness of treatments — states that the council’s recommendations cannot “be construed as mandates or clinical guidelines for payment, coverage or treatment.”
But Ms. McCaughey’s article provided another opportunity for others to raise the specter of forced euthanasia. “Sometimes for the common good, you just have to say, ‘Hey, Grandpa, you’ve had a good life,’ ” Mr. Beck said. The syndicated conservative columnist Cal Thomas wrote, “No one should be surprised at the coming embrace of euthanasia.”
The Washington Times editorial page reprised its reference to the Nazis, quoting the Aktion T4 program: “It must be made clear to anyone suffering from an incurable disease that the useless dissipation of costly medications drawn from the public store cannot be justified.”
But as Congress developed its legislation this summer, critics seized on provisions requiring Medicare financing for “end of life” consultations, bringing the debate to a peak. Still, one proponent of the euthanasia theory, Mr. Neumayr, said he saw no reason to stop making the claim. “I think a government-run plan that is administered by politicians and bureaucrats who support euthanasia is inevitably going to reflect that view,” he said. -from Robert Pear
(John 1:4) In him was life; and the life was the light of men. 그 안에 생명이 있었으니 이 생명은 사람들의 빛이라
(마 7:14) Because strait is the gate, and narrow [is] the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
(요 5:24) Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
(요 6:35) And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.
(요 6:63) It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
(요 10:10) The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have [it] more abundantly.
(요 11:25) Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:
(요 12:25) He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal.
(요 14:6) Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
(행 11:18) When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.
[행 15:25-행 15:25]
(25)사람을 택하여 우리 주 예수 그리스도의 이름을 위하여 생명을 아끼지 아니하는 자인 우리의 사랑하는 바나바와 바울과 함께 너희에게 보내기를 일치 가결하였노라 (25)It seemed good unto us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men unto you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul, who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
(행 20:24) But none of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry, which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the gospel of the grace of God.
(롬 5:17) For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.
(롬 6:4) Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
(롬 8:2) For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
(롬 8:6) For to be carnally minded [is] death; but to be spiritually minded [is] life and peace.
(고전 14:7) And even things without life giving sound, whether pipe or harp, except they give a distinction in the sounds, how shall it be known what is piped or harped?
(고후 4:10) Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body.
(고후 4:11) For we which live are alway delivered unto death for Jesus' sake, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our mortal flesh.
(고후 4:12) So then death worketh in us, but life in you.
(고후 5:4) For we that are in this tabernacle do groan, being burdened: not for that we would be unclothed, but clothed upon, that mortality might be swallowed up of life.
(엡 4:18) Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart:
(빌 2:16) Holding forth the word of life; that I may rejoice in the day of Christ, that I have not run in vain, neither laboured in vain.
(골 3:3) For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God.
(골 3:4) When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory.
(딤후 1:10) But is now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour Jesus Christ, who hath abolished death, and hath brought life and immortality to light through the gospel:
(약 1:12) Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.
(약 4:14) Whereas ye know not what shall be on the morrow. For what is your life? It is even a vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away.
(벧전 3:10) For he that will love life, and see good days, let him refrain his tongue from evil, and his lips that they speak no guile:
(벧후 1:3) According as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue:
(요일 3:14) We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not [his] brother abideth in death.
(요일 5:11) And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
(요일 5:12) He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.
(계 2:7) He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.
(계 2:10) Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.
(계 3:5) He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.
(계 7:17) For the Lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall feed them, and shall lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes.
(계 12:11) And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
(계 13:8) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
(계 17:8) The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
(계 20:12) And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
(계 20:15) And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
(계 21:6) And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
(계 21:27) And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.
(계 22:1) And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.
(계 22:2) In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, [was there] the tree of life, which bare twelve [manner of] fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree [were] for the healing of the nations.
(계 22:14) Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
(계 22:17) And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.
(계 22:19) And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
JD-Class/Pastor P.K. ObamaCare HR3200-Death Panels
FORWARDS -PIC -from Pastor Kang, Thanks-
743 S. Grandview St. L.A. CA. 90057 Tel. (213)928-2932 Pastor P.K.
Every Sunday 3:30 pm JD-class Email: peterkim123@sbcglobal.net Seeking to make disciples who make disciples.
“그러나 너는 모든 일에 근신하여 고난을 받으며 전도인의 일을 하며 네 직무를 다하라” But watch thou in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry. II Tim 4:5
Devotional to JDs,
Obama Healthcare HR3200 for VeriChip & Watch !!! “Death Panels” Watch!!!
The Path to preset for AntiChrist 666 for Total horror control
[계 20:4-계 20:5]
(4)또 내가 보좌들을 보니 거기 앉은 자들이 있어 심판하는 권세를 받았더라 또 내가 보니 예수의 증거와 하나님의 말씀을 인하여 목 베임을 받은 자의 영혼들과 또 짐승과 그의 우상에게 경배하지도 아니하고 이마와 손에 그의 표를 받지도 아니한 자들이 살아서 그리스도로 더불어 천년 동안 왕 노릇하니 (5)(그 나머지 죽은 자들은 그 천년이 차기까지 살지 못하더라) 이는 첫째 부활이라
(4)And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. (5) But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. Rev 20:4-5
To the Palin/HR 3200 provision on end-of-life counseling they talk about panel discussions on the definition of death. I have this vision of a room with a couple of tables, behind which sit men with mean faces and military uniforms. These are not Americans, by the way, so this death panel is somewhere else. There are armed guards at the doors, and the doors open, with more guards escorting in a small group of people at gunpoint.
One of the officers at the table shuffles some papers and reads off a charge of the people having violated some oppressive rule of the regime, perhaps having published critical articles about men with mean faces and military uniforms. Then the officer tells the people they are all sentenced to death, and the people start crying and cursing as their guards drag them away.
I'll admit I haven't read the entirety of HR 3200, but I haven't seen anything remotely like that scenario. I can believe such death panels happened in Nazi Germany or some oppressed Latin American country. I think it is a tremendous exaggeration to call the end-of-life counseling with a doctor a death panel. Sensitive people might feel pressured to forgo care or, if a patient is in a coma, perhaps the individual named to consider such matters in the patient's Living Will could be pressured to forgo further attempts to extend grandma's life.
Abuses of any power can be hypothesized to occur. However....the bill does put substantial authority into the government's hands instead of the insurance company's hands. So it is prudent, I think, to verify what powers the government is going to give itself.
DANGER! From my reading, the bigger danger as far as a death panel comes from the powers of the Health Choices Commissioner (Sec. 203(a)) and the Health Benefits Advisory Committee (Sec. 123(a)&(b)): DANGER!
HR3200 -Sec. 203(a):
"The Commissioner shall specify the benefits to be made available under Exchange-participating health benefits plans during each plan year..."
Sec. 123(a)): "There is established a private-public advisory committee which shall be a panel of medical and other experts to be known as the Health Benefits Advisory Committee to recommend covered benefits and essential, enhanced, and premium plans."
Sec 123(b) (1) "The Health Benefits Advisory Committee shall recommend to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this subtitle referred to as the ‘‘Secretary’’) benefit standards (as defined in paragraph (4)), and periodic updates to such standards. In developing such recommendations, the Committee shall take into account innovation in health care and consider how such standards could reduce health disparities."
Covered benefits (Sec 123(b)(4), "including categories of covered treatments, items and services within benefit classes, and cost-sharing"), meaning things like knee replacements and cancer treatments, will be determined by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Health Choices Commissioner (to be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate), and the Health Benefits Advisory Committee (to be appointed by the President [up to 17 people] and the Comptroller General [9 people], without confirmation).
There is obvious opportunity here for the Secretary, Commissioner, and Committee to recommend that some condition not be covered, such as dementia or other category-likely conditions. No one is going to pull the plug on grandma, but they could decide they just aren't going to pay for having her plugged in, at all. But let's assume that the conditions are officially covered. We aren't out of the woods yet.
Title IV, Section 2404, covers the implementation of best practices. It involves changing the Public Health Care Act, by inserting some new sections, including Part D, Section 931(h), which says that in general, "The Director shall enter into voluntary arrangements with health care providers (including hospitals and other health facilities and health practitioners) in a State or region to implement best practices identified or developed under this section." (by the Secretary).
The Director is defined in the Public Health Care Act, which I haven't looked up, but I believe the intent is that doctors will be informed of best practices but not required to use them, not even by having payment depend on having used them.
Voluntary guidelines can be ignored. If the doctors don’t agree with the treatments recommended, they will generally be inclined to ignore them.
Thus, no cost savings. Perhaps the government plans to incentivize the doctors by paying them more if they use the recommended treatments? That doesn’t sound like it would promote cost savings, even if doctors are all as greedy as the President has implied, so that they use whatever treatment enriches them the most genenally.
So if you have invested money in figuring out how to save money and then the recommendations are ignored, you have lost money. When this happens, what stops the government from taking steps to make the guidelines into requirements? To control costs, of course. To keep the health care financial burden from destroying the economy.
Once the guidelines are requirements, the door is open to the government making recommended treatment guidelines based on political considerations to reduce the number of people in a category that is, shall we say, inconvenient to have around. That would fit the definition of a death panel. It’s more impersonal and more efficient than what the phrase conjures up as a vision, but people would die as a result of the council’s decisions. People would die to save money.
The point is that the worst thing about the bill is that it gives government the power and authority to do terrible things. The bill contains fragile protections that could be overruled later with much less fanfare than the current bill has, when people have relaxed, thinking the fight is over. The only real safety is in keeping government out of the insurance business altogether.
No Commissioner, Committee, Exchange, best practices recommendations...just you, your doctor, and your insurance company. This doesn't mean there is no useful reform to be had. Coverage of pre-existing conditions and ensured portability are good reforms. Letting people buy insurance across state lines, while I don't think it will help much, is a reasonable choice. Rolling Medicare and Medicaid together and loosening the restrictions so anyone can sign up, and pay income-dependent premiums (so everyone has "skin in the game"), would amount to a public option but that's what Medicare and Medicaid already are.
If my insurance company denies me coverage for some treatment, and I survive, I might be able to find a different insurance company without having to leave the country. Where and how am I going to find another government? I could sue an insurance company, but am I going to be able to sue the government? – Ritmore.
Death Panel이라는 단어가 미국 정치권의 키워드로 부상했다. 버락 오바마 대통령이 타운홀미팅을 통해 의료보험 개혁에 드라이브를 걸자, 공화당과 의료업계 로비스트들은 Death Panel을 만들려는 의도가 감춰져 있다며 반발했다. 이 단어가 튀어나오자 미국 전체가 양분돼 찬반 소용돌이에 빠져들었다. 죽음을 앞둔 노인들에게 바로 어필했다. Death Panel은 환자의 생사를 가르는 안락사를 결정하는 위원회를 뜻한다.
하지만 국내언론들은 Death Panel을 엉뚱하게 번역했다. 정부 공무원들로 구성된 '죽음의 위원회’라는 것이다. '죽음의 위원회'라고 번역하면 미국 노인들이 반발하는 기저에 깔린 뜻을 전달하기에는 부족하다. Death Panel을 다룬 언론보도를 살펴보자.
<연합뉴스 8월 16일 2010년 보도>
"공화당 부통령 후보였던 세라 페일린 전 알래스카 주지사가 의보개혁이 이뤄지면 비용 절감을 위해 `죽음의 위원회'(death panel), 즉 공무원 조직을 통해 환자의 운명이 결정될 것이라고 말하는 등 의보개혁 `공포심'을 조장하는 것을 겨냥한 것이다.
<연합뉴스 8월 16일 보도>
"의보개혁이 이뤄지면 정부가 노인 환자들의 치료 거부를 결정하는 '죽음의 위원
회'(death panel)를 세울 것이라는 공화당 측의 공포심 조장에 대해서도 자신 친할
머니의 죽음을 언급하며 강하게 반박했다." 연합뉴스의 보도를 보면 Death Panel이 공무원조직이고 비용을 절약하기 위해 노인환자 치료를 거부하는 결정권을 가지고 있다.
<동아일보 8월 15일자>
“지난해 대선 공화당 부통령 후보였던 세라 페일린 전 알래스카 주지사는 “민주당 개혁안이 통과되면 (국영 보험의 지출을 줄이기 위해) 차도가 없는 병든 노인들은 사실상 강제로 치료가 중단되고, 나의 막내아들(다운증후군을 갖고 태어난 아기)도 세상에 태어나지 못했을 것”이라는 자극적 주장을 하고 있다. 그러면서 민주당이 ‘죽음의 위원회(death panel)’를 만들려 한다고 낙인찍었다. ”
CBS
“오바마 개혁안이 통과되면 병의 경력을 이유로 보험 자격이 상실되고 '죽음 위원회' (death panel. 건강보험 통제권을 가진 정부관리)로부터 치료를 거부당하게 될 것이라고 주장하고 있다.”
다음은 위키피디아에 실린 것으로 H.R.3200에 대한 설명이다. 이는 2009년 7월 14일 민주당이 하원에 발의한 의료보험개혁 법안이다. 이 법안 중에서 환자가 사망선택유언을 할 경우 카운셀링한 것에 대한 비용환급 문제를 다룬 Reimbursement for counseling about living wills을 보면 Death Panel과 관련된 설명이 나온다.
The Advance Care Planning Consultation proposal in the legislation has been criticized by some Republicans and conservatives, such as Betsy McCaughey, a lobbyist for the healthcare industry who also helped to defeat the Clinton health care plan of 1993, who allege that it includes mandatory language aimed at pressing elderly patients toward euthanasia.
[7] That provision was also the basis for a charge by Sarah Palin that "my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their 'level of productivity in society,'whether they are worthy of health care."
[8] In fact, the cited provision of the bill merely authorizes Medicare reimbursement for physicians who provide voluntary counseling about such subjects as living wills. [7] [8] The provision is based on a separate bill that was cosponsored by a Republican, Charles Boustany of Louisiana. [9] His Democratic cosponsor, Earl Blumenauer of Oregon, has called this attack on the bill "an all-time low".
[9] The "death panel" argument was endorsed by the Investor's Business Daily, which analogized the bill to the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom and editorialized: "People such as scientist Stephen Hawking wouldn't have a chance in the U.K., where the National Health Service would say the life of this brilliant man, because of his physical handicaps, is essentially worthless." [10] Hawking, who has lived his entire life in the United Kingdom,[11] responded, "I wouldn’t be here today if it were not for the NHS. I have received a large amount of high-quality treatment without which I would not have survived."[12]
위 내용은 Death Panel을 둘러싼 논란을 설명한 것으로, Advance Care Planning Consultation(ACPC)을 법안에 넣은게 공화당과 로비스트 베스티 맥코이 등 보수주의자들의 공격 타깃이 되고 있다는 것이다. 법안의 세부내용을 살펴보면 ACPC는 환자와 의사 간에 이뤄진 상담으로 사망선택유언 등 향후 치료전반에 대한 내용을 포괄적으로 설명하고 있다.
직역하면 '향후관리계획자문'인데 안락사 등 앞으로 어떻게 하는게 좋을지 환자에게 상담해주는 것을 말한다. 맥코이는 이를 두고 노인환자들에게 안락사를 강요하는 강제적인 조항이라고 공격했다. 2008년 대선때 공화당 부통령 후보였던 새라 페일린은 맥코이의 주장을 따라이 조항을 집중적으로 공격했다.
"나의 부모 또는 다운 증후군을 앓고 있는 나의 아들이 오바마의 Death Panel 앞에서 서야할 것이다." 요컨대 오바마의 의료개혁법이 실행되면 관료들이 사망여부를 결정하는 Death Panel을 구성하게 되고, 생산성이 떨어지는 사람들은 이 위원회에서 생사가 갈린다는 논리이다. 실제로 법안의 이 부분은 사망 선택유언 (Living Will)과 관련해 카운셀링을 한 의사에게도 진료비를 의료보험에서 지급토록 할 수 있도록 하는 내용이다.
Death Panel은 안락사 또는 존엄사를 결정하는 위원회에 가깝다. "사망선고 위원회"라고 말하는게 가장 근접한 번역이 될 듯하다. 생명위원회 또는 국가생명 윤리위원회라고 병기하면 그 속에 감춰진 뜻을 전달할 수 있다. 이 위원회는 의료 비용를 줄이기 위한 관료조직을 말하는게 아니다. 공화당이 생명윤리 문제를 다루는 조직의 설립에 대한 위기감을 확산시키기 위해 Death Panel이라는 것이다.
On the Obama - Death Panel
Whether or not this is actually Obama, this poster alone is cause for impeachment. The ObamaCare Death Panel (OC DP) or Obama's Death Panel, is a group of who are the deciders for who gets sacrificed on the altar of socialized medicine. Their secret plot was exposed by The Greatest Maveratrix Ever, who had no choice but to exploit to defend her handicapped son, Trig, for the sake of attention children everywhere.
Now, sure, the fact huggers out there will try to tell you that Obama's plan only includes voluntary "end of life" counseling, and that the "death panel" is a crass fiction made up by desperate Republican spin doctors. Don't listen! Real or not, doesn't "death panel" feel scary?
Who Can Become An Obama Death Panel Worker?
Ideal candidates for a "death panel" include abortion doctors who need a little work on the side when it is not "abortion season". Like fetuses, old people are easily dispatched with the combination of tongs and vacuums.
Your local Death Panel may also include one or more of the following:
A Horse Doctor
An animal shelter employee
A meat plant janitor
A Libertarian
What Do Obama Death Panel Workers Do?
Whatever Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck say they do. After all, they both have children; are you questioning the concerns of loving parents? How dare you!
Where Do Obama Death Panel Workers Work?
Construction is being completed on the FEMA camps where all the undesirables are sent for socialist re-education and homosexualization.
Myths About Obama's Death Panel
Obama's only trying to encourage old people to make out living wills
Even if this were true, Obama would still be committing heresy; after all, God is the only one who can decide when you die, and it is your duty as a good Christian to linger on for years in a state of living death until He calls you to His side. Amen.
Who Supports Death Panels
The Autism Society of America - these liberal monsters actually form autism fan clubs!
Who is Joining the Fight Against "Death Panels"
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.)
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA)
And Many Real Americans
Obama's Death Panel Defeated: We Won! Old People Won't Have to Die!
Thanks to the infinite wisdom of Sarah Palin, old people will have to pay costly bills before they die cursing their wretched suffering won't have to suffer at the hands of death anymore! Hurray!
Palin vs. Obama: Death Panels
On Aug. 12, 2009 Palin attempted to clear up her argument with a detailed Facebook post. Palin discussed Section 1233 and said that "it’s misleading for the President to describe this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients." Palin goes onto argue:
Palin, Aug. 12: The issue is the context in which that information is provided and the coercive effect these consultations will have in that context. … These consultations are authorized whenever a Medicare recipient’s health changes significantly or when they enter a nursing home, and they are part of a bill whose stated purpose is “to reduce the growth in health care spending.” Is it any wonder that senior citizens might view such consultations as attempts to convince them to help reduce health care costs by accepting minimal end-of-life care?
The fact remains that the bill wouldn’t require patients to receive counseling sessions, nor would it require a doctor to offer one. Rather, it modifies Section 1861(s)2 of the Social Security Act, defining what services Medicare will pay for. So if a patient receives a counseling session from a doctor or health care practitioner, he or she doesn’t have to pay for it – Medicare will. As we pointed out in our earlier story, Medicare will also pay for prosthetic limbs, but that doesn’t mean that every recipient gets those, too.
And the concern that these sessions are "part of a bill whose stated purpose is ‘to reduce the growth in health care spending,’ " while true, is hardly the whole story. One of the bill’s other goals is to "provide affordable, quality health care for all Americans." The legislation is 1,017 pages long with sections that cut costs, some that increase care, and some that do both. In fact, the counseling sessions would add to government expenses since Medicare would have to reimburse doctors.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates officially that Section 1233 will cost a net total of $2.7 billion over 10 years. Furthermore, proposals to offer reimbursement for such counseling have attracted bipartisan support. Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson of Georgia, a sponsor of one such measure, gave an interview to the Washington Post on August 10, in which he discussed the benefits of these counseling sessions "both for the sanity of the family and what savings the family has." Isakson also commented on the recent confusion around the issue:
Isakson, Aug. 10: I just had a phone call where someone said Sarah Palin’s web site had talked about the House bill having death panels on it where people would be euthanized. How someone could take an end of life directive or a living will as that is nuts. You’re putting the authority in the individual rather than the government. I don’t know how that got so mixed up.
Palin also attempts to buttress her case by quoting some writings by Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, a health policy adviser to the president. Here she’s echoing claims made elsewhere, twisting the meaning of Emanuel’s writings and taking them out of context. We examined those claims in an Ask FactCheck item we posted earlier today, and won’t repeat the details here.
Mr. Grassley said in a statement that he and others in the small group of senators that was trying to negotiate a health care plan had dropped any “end of life” proposals from consideration. A pending House bill has language authorizing Medicare to finance beneficiaries’ consultations with professionals on whether to authorize aggressive and potentially life-saving interventions later in life. Though the consultations would be voluntary, and a similar provision passed in Congress last year without such a furor, Mr. Grassley said it was being dropped in the Senate “because of the way they could be misinterpreted and implemented incorrectly.”
In an editorial, the newspaper reminded its readers of the Aktion T4 program of Nazi Germany in which “children and adults with disabilities, and anyone anywhere in the Third Reich was subject to execution who was blind, deaf, senile, retarded, or had any significant neurological condition.”
When the Democrats included money for family planning in a proposed version of the stimulus bill in January, the socially conservative George Neumayr wrote for the American Spectator: “Euthanasia is another shovel ready job for Pelosi to assign to the states. Reducing health care costs under Obama’s plan, after all, counts as economic stimulus, too — controlling life, controlling death, controlling costs.”
The legislation did not direct the coordinator to dictate doctors’ treatments. A separate part of the law — regarding a council set up to coordinate research comparing the effectiveness of treatments — states that the council’s recommendations cannot “be construed as mandates or clinical guidelines for payment, coverage or treatment.”
But Ms. McCaughey’s article provided another opportunity for others to raise the specter of forced euthanasia. “Sometimes for the common good, you just have to say, ‘Hey, Grandpa, you’ve had a good life,’ ” Mr. Beck said. The syndicated conservative columnist Cal Thomas wrote, “No one should be surprised at the coming embrace of euthanasia.”
The Washington Times editorial page reprised its reference to the Nazis, quoting the Aktion T4 program: “It must be made clear to anyone suffering from an incurable disease that the useless dissipation of costly medications drawn from the public store cannot be justified.”
But as Congress developed its legislation this summer, critics seized on provisions requiring Medicare financing for “end of life” consultations, bringing the debate to a peak. Still, one proponent of the euthanasia theory, Mr. Neumayr, said he saw no reason to stop making the claim. “I think a government-run plan that is administered by politicians and bureaucrats who support euthanasia is inevitably going to reflect that view,” he said. -from Robert Pear
(John 1:4) In him was life; and the life was the light of men. 그 안에 생명이 있었으니 이 생명은 사람들의 빛이라
(마 7:14) Because strait is the gate, and narrow [is] the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.
(요 5:24) Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
(요 6:35) And Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.
(요 6:63) It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
(요 10:10) The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy: I am come that they might have life, and that they might have [it] more abundantly.
(요 11:25) Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:
(요 12:25) He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal.
(요 14:6) Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
(행 11:18) When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.
[행 15:25-행 15:25]
(25)사람을 택하여 우리 주 예수 그리스도의 이름을 위하여 생명을 아끼지 아니하는 자인 우리의 사랑하는 바나바와 바울과 함께 너희에게 보내기를 일치 가결하였노라 (25)It seemed good unto us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men unto you with our beloved Barnabas and Paul, who have risked their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.
(행 20:24) But none of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry, which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the gospel of the grace of God.
(롬 5:17) For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.
(롬 6:4) Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
(롬 8:2) For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.
(롬 8:6) For to be carnally minded [is] death; but to be spiritually minded [is] life and peace.
(고전 14:7) And even things without life giving sound, whether pipe or harp, except they give a distinction in the sounds, how shall it be known what is piped or harped?
(고후 4:10) Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body.
(고후 4:11) For we which live are alway delivered unto death for Jesus' sake, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our mortal flesh.
(고후 4:12) So then death worketh in us, but life in you.
(고후 5:4) For we that are in this tabernacle do groan, being burdened: not for that we would be unclothed, but clothed upon, that mortality might be swallowed up of life.
(엡 4:18) Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart:
(빌 2:16) Holding forth the word of life; that I may rejoice in the day of Christ, that I have not run in vain, neither laboured in vain.
(골 3:3) For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God.
(골 3:4) When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory.
(딤후 1:10) But is now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour Jesus Christ, who hath abolished death, and hath brought life and immortality to light through the gospel:
(약 1:12) Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.
(약 4:14) Whereas ye know not what shall be on the morrow. For what is your life? It is even a vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away.
(벧전 3:10) For he that will love life, and see good days, let him refrain his tongue from evil, and his lips that they speak no guile:
(벧후 1:3) According as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue:
(요일 3:14) We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not [his] brother abideth in death.
(요일 5:11) And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
(요일 5:12) He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.
(계 2:7) He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.
(계 2:10) Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.
(계 3:5) He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.
(계 7:17) For the Lamb which is in the midst of the throne shall feed them, and shall lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes.
(계 12:11) And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
(계 13:8) And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
(계 17:8) The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
(계 20:12) And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
(계 20:15) And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
(계 21:6) And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.
(계 21:27) And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.
(계 22:1) And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.
(계 22:2) In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, [was there] the tree of life, which bare twelve [manner of] fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree [were] for the healing of the nations.
(계 22:14) Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
(계 22:17) And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.
(계 22:19) And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.
JD-Class/Pastor P.K. ObamaCare HR3200-Death Panels
FORWARDS -PIC -from Pastor Kang, Thanks-
